ibf

Analyseverbot: critic with refined tastes vs. analysis proper — Işık Barış Fidaner

🎵 Tod MacGowan had a talk 🤠👻

From S. Žižek’s Frankfurt intervention was born a new concept: Analyseverbot.

The ‘ban on analysis’ is obviously modeled on the ‘ban on thinking’: Denkverbot.

Hindering thought directly may seem worse than hindering its analytical fruit/seed.

But ‘one speaks more than one thinks’ & analysis is more precious than thought.

Most of conscious thought is distorted by superego rationalization mechanisms.

Analysis proper can only emerge after subtracting the ‘critical’ aspect of thought.

Freudian ‘interpretation/free association’ requires that one suspend all criticism.

Analyseverbot is paradoxical in that it does not forbid ‘critical thought’ per se.

On the contrary, superegoic criticism is being mobilized against analysis proper.

Analyseverbot tendency was already present in the superegoism of Anna Freud.

Ego-psychology was already an Analyseverbot that disavowed Freudian analysis.

I have been writing about the widening chasm between ‘criticism vs. analysis’ [1].

Analysis takes cognitive cost, but superego prefers to ‘show blood’ as evidence.

‘Concrete evidence’ can be ‘dead bodies’ or (equivalently) showing ‘good taste’.

The model behind this is menstrual blood, which thereby became the Woke taboo.

The ‘critic with refined tastes’ is ripped off from the proper figure of the analyst.

Just like Todd McGowan blaming Freud about racism and building his own ego [2].

As states & terrorists ‘show Azrael around social media’ things turn for the worse.

Turkey’s milestones were 20 July and 10 October 2015 ISIS attacks against leftists.

Işık Barış Fidaner is a computer scientist with a PhD from Boğaziçi University, İstanbul. Admin of Yersiz Şeyler, Editor of Žižekian Analysis, Curator of Görce Writings. Twitter: @BarisFidaner

Notes:

[1] See “Genuine Analysis is Beyond Criticism: Criticism Reveals Imposture, Analysis Reveals Self-Sabotage”, “From hypo-critical reason to hippo-queery-tickle reason: Just a dream → A just dream → Adjust dream”, “Psychocritical Wisdom Is Not Psychoanalysis”, “Ladders and Philosophy: Context and Scope”, “Criticizing Flowers or No Fruit Without Flower”; Žižek also wrote about ‘critique of critique’ in his book Surplus-Enjoyment: A Guide For The Non-Perplexed (2022). See also “Sigmund Freud ‘Halkla İlişkiler’in dayısı ve eniştesi mi?” about Adam Curtis’ disavowal of Freud in The Century of the Self (2002).

[2] See “Todd McGowan’s hypocritical ingratitude” ChatGPT

7 comments

  5. […] The danger of their coupling is simple and recurring. Enigma can become a renewable resource that powers continuation, so that each charged term merely authorizes another round of elaboration. Continuation can become a method of avoiding the cut demanded by the Real, so that the chain keeps moving around the resistant point while producing the impression of ever-closer approach. This is why the Schreber contrast between enigma-word and refrain matters as a blueprint, because it shows how charge and repetition can coexist in a single economy of discourse, and how easily the charged element can be captured by the repetitive one. (🔗). (Žižekian Analysis) […]

    Like

  6. […] Ein wiederkehrendes öffentliches Regel-Set kann mit einem einzigen diagnostischen Begriff benannt werden: Analyseverbot. Der Begriff verweist auf ein Umfeld, in dem Kritik erlaubt, sogar gefeiert ist, während Analyse im eigentlichen Sinn behindert wird. Kritik ist in diesem Sinn sicher, weil sie auf der Ebene von Haltung, Geschmack und Denunziation bleiben kann und Anerkennungen produziert, ohne irgendjemanden an einen konkreten Verlust zu binden. Analyse ist riskant, weil sie auf den Punkt zielt, an dem ein Subjekt, eine Institution oder ein Diskurs seine eigene Funktionsweise ändern müsste, statt bloß die Welt zu kommentieren. Die Ökologie, die Analyse verbietet, kündigt sich selten als Verbot an; sie präsentiert sich als Sophistikation, Ausgewogenheit, Verantwortlichkeit oder Professionalität und bestraft dann still bindende Unterbrechung als „zu viel“, „unangemessen“, „unproduktiv“ oder „unsicher“. (🔗) […]

    Like

  7. […] Bu ikisinin kuplajının tehlikesi basit ve tekrar tekrar ortaya çıkar. Muamma, devamlılığı güçlendiren yenilenebilir bir kaynak hâline gelebilir; öyle ki her yüklü terim yalnızca bir ayrıntılandırma turunu daha yetkilendirir. Devamlılık, Reel’in talep ettiği kesmeden kaçınma yöntemi hâline gelebilir; böylece zincir, dirençli noktanın etrafında dönüp dururken durmadan daha da yaklaşıyormuş izlenimi üretir. Bu yüzden Schreber’de muamma-sözcük ile nakarat arasındaki karşıtlık, bir şablon olarak önemlidir; çünkü yük ile yinelemenin tek bir söylem ekonomisi içinde nasıl bir arada bulunabildiğini ve yüklü unsurun yinelenen unsur tarafından ne kadar kolay yakalanabildiğini gösterir (zizekanalysis.com: 🔗). Žižekian Analysis (🔗). […]

    Like

Comments are closed.