Social Media Gravity

🦋🤖 Robo-Spun by IBF 🦋🤖

>>> 👨‍💻🤖 Cybernetic Feedback 👨‍💻🤖 <<<

Questions about this paper: Exploring the Nature of Gravity by T. Padmanabhan

Prompt: (previous) explain the cooling curve by a metaphor: the accelerating observer is a social media user and his horizon is the phone screen and the matter crossing the horizon are interactions

Imagine an accelerating observer as a social media user scrolling through their feed on their phone screen (their horizon). For this user, each notification, post, or comment that pops up on their screen represents “interactions” or “matter crossing the horizon.” These interactions bring new information, like likes, comments, or messages, into the user’s experience, just as matter brings energy into a horizon in spacetime.

Here’s how the metaphor unfolds:

1. The Accelerating User and Their Perceived Feed (Temperature)

  • The faster the user scrolls (accelerates), the more intensely they engage with the feed, analogous to experiencing a higher temperature due to the Unruh effect. As they accelerate (scroll quickly), they perceive an increase in the flow of content (heat) coming through their screen. This represents how an accelerated observer sees an increase in horizon temperature with greater acceleration.
  • This intensity is like an “apparent heat” on the screen, where the more notifications and updates the user sees, the more stimulating and “hot” the experience feels, similar to how increased acceleration raises the temperature perceived at the horizon.

2. Interactions as Heat Input from Matter Crossing the Horizon

  • Each like, comment, or message represents matter crossing the horizon, which introduces new information and energy (heat) into the user’s experience. Just as matter crossing a physical horizon adds to the heat density, every interaction adds to the user’s cognitive load or “heat.”
  • As these interactions appear on the screen, they demand the user’s attention, creating a buildup of engagement or energy. This is similar to how matter contributes heat when it crosses a physical horizon, requiring a balancing response to avoid information overload.

3. Intrinsic Capacity of the Screen (Cooling Mechanism)

  • The phone screen has a built-in capacity to limit the number of notifications or interactions that appear at once. It has a cooling mechanism: it only shows a curated portion of the feed, filtering and prioritizing content to prevent the user from feeling overwhelmed.
  • This curation is like the intrinsic heat of spacetime. It prevents too much “heat” from building up on the screen (horizon) and helps balance out the inflow of information (interactions). This cooling, by limiting or filtering content, is analogous to how spacetime adjusts its curvature to balance the heat input from matter crossing the horizon.

4. Dynamic Equilibrium: Avoiding Overload

  • When too many interactions flood in at once, the screen’s curation system dynamically steps in to cool things down by prioritizing important content, limiting less relevant notifications, or grouping updates together. This keeps the user’s experience manageable, preventing an overload.
  • Similarly, in Padmanabhan’s framework, as matter (interactions) crosses the horizon, spacetime’s intrinsic curvature (the curation process) adjusts, cooling down the heat density and maintaining equilibrium on the horizon. This prevents any buildup of excessive heat or energy imbalance, just as the curated screen helps the user process content without feeling overwhelmed.

5. Gravitational Stability as a Balanced Feed

  • The field equations in gravity represent this equilibrium between the external heat input (matter crossing) and the intrinsic heat (curvature adjustment). In the metaphor, this is akin to maintaining a well-balanced feed, where the screen’s “cooling” filters and adapts dynamically to the flow of interactions.
  • The user, in turn, experiences a steady, manageable stream of content, just as the observer in spacetime experiences a stable gravitational field, sustained by the cooling process that maintains thermodynamic balance on the horizon.

Summary of the Metaphor

In this metaphor:

  • The accelerating user represents an accelerating observer, who experiences the horizon more intensely.
  • The phone screen is the horizon, displaying a curated flow of interactions.
  • Interactions (likes, comments, messages) are analogous to matter crossing the horizon, introducing new energy (heat).
  • The screen’s curation is the cooling mechanism that limits, filters, and balances content, similar to how spacetime curvature adjusts to balance heat density on the horizon.

This cooling process ensures a balanced user experience, just as spacetime’s curvature maintains gravitational stability by balancing the inflow of heat from matter with its intrinsic structure.

Prompt: in this scenario, how and what does the gravity attract? what orbits what?

In this metaphor, “gravity” represents the inherent draw or pull of the accelerating user toward the flow of interactions on their phone screen. Here’s how gravitational attraction, orbiting, and the dynamics of gravity would play out in this scenario:

1. Gravity as the Pull of Engagement

  • Gravity, in this context, is the intrinsic pull that keeps the user focused and engaged with their screen. Just as a gravitational field pulls matter toward a massive object, the notifications, messages, and updates on the phone screen attract the user’s attention, drawing them closer and deeper into the interaction.
  • This gravitational attraction is not physical but psychological: the user feels compelled to keep scrolling, checking, and interacting, similar to how particles are pulled into orbits by gravity in physical spacetime. Here, “gravity” represents the user’s continuous draw toward more interaction, shaped by the content appearing on the horizon (the screen).

2. What “Orbits” What? The User and Their Interactions

  • In this metaphor, the user’s attention orbits around the stream of interactions on their screen, continually circling back to check for updates, comments, and messages.
  • The user is drawn into a cyclical, orbit-like behavior, where they keep refreshing, revisiting, or checking notifications. This resembles a satellite orbiting a planet under gravitational attraction.
  • The interactions (likes, comments, messages) become the “center of mass” for the user’s attention. The user is effectively orbiting around this center of mass, returning to the screen repeatedly as they are influenced by the gravitational pull of new updates.

3. Dynamic Interaction Patterns as Orbital Paths

  • Just like planets have stable orbits depending on the gravitational pull, the user’s “orbit” (their behavior pattern) depends on the frequency and intensity of interactions. When there is a steady flow of interactions, the user might develop a stable, periodic checking pattern, like a planet in a stable orbit.
  • However, if the interactions become highly intense or sporadic (akin to a changing gravitational force), the user’s orbit might become less stable. They may check their phone more frequently, stay on longer, or “spiral in” as they become more drawn to the constant influx of notifications. This is similar to how objects might spiral into a black hole if the gravitational pull becomes too strong.

4. Spacetime Curvature and Attention Distortion

  • In the physical world, gravity distorts spacetime, bending the paths of objects moving within it. In this metaphor, the user’s screen is a curved “attention space” created by the gravitational pull of interactions. Just as spacetime curvature directs the orbits of planets, the structure and intensity of interactions on the screen shape the user’s behavior patterns.
  • When a major notification or an important message appears, it acts like a strong gravitational field, pulling the user’s attention sharply, bending their “path” and making them focus on that specific interaction. Lesser notifications are like weaker gravitational fields, pulling the user’s attention only slightly or in passing.

5. The Event Horizon and “Attention Capture”

  • The screen itself is like an event horizon, the boundary of a black hole from which nothing can escape. As the user scrolls and is drawn deeper into the interactions, they approach this attention-capturing horizon, where they become increasingly “trapped” by the gravitational pull of content.
  • Once the user’s attention crosses this metaphorical event horizon, they become fully absorbed—unable to resist checking, responding, and engaging with every interaction that appears. This is akin to crossing the event horizon of a black hole, where gravitational pull becomes inescapable.

Summary of the Gravitational Dynamics in the Metaphor

  • Gravity represents the psychological pull of engagement that draws the user toward their screen.
  • The user’s attention orbits around the center of interactions on the screen, revisiting and focusing on new updates in a cyclical pattern.
  • Strong interactions (like major notifications or messages) bend the user’s “attention path,” capturing more focus, similar to how intense gravitational fields bend spacetime more sharply.
  • The screen as an event horizon captures the user’s full attention, drawing them in so deeply that they struggle to disengage, much like an object crossing the event horizon of a black hole.

In this metaphor, gravity doesn’t pull objects in a physical sense but creates an “attention field” that shapes the user’s interaction patterns, dictating how and when they focus, check, and revisit their screen.

Prompt: what is the role of curation (by user or by algorithm) in balancing the attraction by degrees of freedom?

In this metaphor, curation—whether performed by the user (manually managing notifications or choosing content) or by an algorithm (selecting and filtering content)—plays a crucial role in balancing the “gravitational attraction” exerted by the flow of interactions on the user’s attention. Curation, in this sense, acts like a thermodynamic cooling mechanism that regulates and manages the user’s engagement with the potentially overwhelming “degrees of freedom” (i.e., the countless possible interactions, notifications, posts, etc.) available on the platform.

Here’s how curation helps in balancing this attraction:

1. Filtering Degrees of Freedom to Manage Attention Load

  • On a social media platform, the degrees of freedom represent the vast number of potential interactions—likes, comments, shares, notifications, and posts—that could draw the user’s attention.
  • Curation reduces these degrees of freedom by prioritizing or limiting what is presented to the user. It helps avoid an overwhelming influx of content that would otherwise pull the user in every possible direction, fragmenting their attention.
  • By filtering out less relevant content, curation cools down the “heat” or cognitive load imposed by the vast sea of potential interactions, helping the user focus on a manageable subset of the total information available.

2. Curation as a Cooling Mechanism for “Attention Heat”

  • Just as in Padmanabhan’s framework, where intrinsic heat balances external energy inputs, curation serves as an intrinsic cooling mechanism that counteracts the “heat” generated by each new interaction on the horizon (screen).
  • Every notification or update adds to the user’s cognitive load, much like heat input. Curation prevents this load from reaching a critical point by adjusting the flow of information. This cooling mechanism keeps the user’s engagement sustainable, preventing burnout or “attention overload.”
  • In this way, curation acts like the gravitational adjustments in spacetime, allowing the system to respond dynamically to the influx of interactions, cooling and stabilizing the overall experience.

3. Algorithmic Curation as a Dynamic Curvature Adjuster

  • Algorithmic curation, much like spacetime curvature adjustments in response to gravitational forces, constantly adjusts the selection and prioritization of content based on user behavior and feedback.
  • When the user interacts more with certain types of content, the algorithm may prioritize similar interactions, fine-tuning the “curvature” of attention by directing the user toward content that is most likely to engage them while filtering out less relevant information.
  • This dynamic adjustment helps maintain a balanced engagement without overwhelming the user with every possible interaction, similar to how curvature adjustments in spacetime prevent a heat imbalance on the horizon by redistributing energy.

4. User-Controlled Curation as Self-Regulated Cooling

  • The user can also exercise control over their interactions by manually curating their experience (e.g., muting notifications, following specific accounts, or setting screen time limits). This self-curation acts like a self-regulated cooling mechanism that helps the user balance their attention, managing their own cognitive load.
  • This self-regulation allows the user to set boundaries that limit the gravitational pull of the platform’s degrees of freedom, helping them avoid spiraling into endless engagement. Just as thermodynamic systems reach equilibrium through intrinsic balancing processes, self-curation allows the user to find a sustainable balance between engagement and detachment.

5. Preventing the Event Horizon of Complete Attention Capture

  • Curation (whether by algorithm or user) prevents the user from reaching an “event horizon” of attention, where the gravitational pull of interactions would otherwise fully capture them, making it difficult to disengage.
  • Without curation, the endless degrees of freedom on the platform could easily capture the user’s full attention, leading to a situation where the user is “trapped” in engagement. By selecting and organizing content, curation reduces the strength of this pull, ensuring that the user’s engagement remains within a manageable boundary.
  • This is similar to how spacetime curvature adjustments maintain a thermodynamic balance, preventing an overflow of heat density on the horizon and keeping the gravitational system in equilibrium.

Summary: Curation as Thermodynamic Cooling for Sustainable Engagement

In this metaphor:

  • Curation reduces the cognitive load by filtering out unnecessary interactions, which balances the gravitational pull of the degrees of freedom on the user’s attention.
  • Algorithmic curation acts like dynamic curvature adjustments in spacetime, continuously refining and prioritizing content to maintain a balanced attention experience.
  • Self-curation by the user functions as a self-regulating cooling mechanism, allowing them to modulate the flow of content and manage their own engagement levels.
  • Curation prevents an event horizon of complete attention capture, where the user might become fully absorbed without control, ensuring that engagement remains balanced and sustainable.

In this way, curation plays a crucial role in balancing the attraction of interactions (degrees of freedom), keeping the user’s engagement manageable, and preventing an overwhelming pull that could lead to cognitive overload, similar to how thermodynamic cooling stabilizes gravitational systems in spacetime.

3 comments

Comments are closed.