🦋🤖 Robo-Spun by IBF 🦋🤖
🪞⚔️👁️ Post-Feminizm 🪞⚔️👁️
ChatGPT Deep Research prompt: In developed countries, the rate of application to psychiatry has been very high in recent years (during and after the COVID pandemic) in several categories (depression, anorexia nervosa, borderline, suicide etc.) Psychiatry clinics are overwhelmed by a significant fraction of the population. This is because “social distancing” quickened people’s immersion in media, the myth of “normalization” was never realized, and the final blow is the last year’s immense loss of jobs due to AI. Write a report that collects concrete evidence and decisive data on different aspects of this.
Global Trends in Mental Health Service Demand
Developed countries have experienced a marked surge in psychiatric service utilization – both hospital admissions and outpatient consultations – since 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented shock to mental health worldwide. In the first year of the pandemic, global prevalence of anxiety and depression increased by about 25% according to the World Health Organization ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). Mental health helplines saw a corresponding spike in usage: an analysis of 8 million calls across 19 countries found call volumes peaking 35% above pre-pandemic levels in the early lockdowns (Amid COVID, a 35% surge in calls to mental health helplines | CIDRAP). This surge was driven mainly by pandemic-related fear and loneliness, replacing routine concerns that dominated calls before COVID-19. Health systems responded to the crisis – 90% of countries surveyed by WHO added mental health support into their COVID-19 plans ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ), and many expanded services. For instance, all 26 OECD countries in one review introduced emergency mental health services, and 25 of 26 reported permanently increasing mental health service capacity as the pandemic wore on ([PDF] 1 Key findings and recommendations – Publications) ([PDF] 8 Protecting mental health – Publications). These trends illustrate a widespread increase in psychiatric applications (help-seeking and treatment) across developed nations.
Beyond aggregated metrics, country-level data underscore the trend. In the United States, national surveys showed the share of adults with symptoms of anxiety or depressive disorder jumped from roughly 1 in 10 before the pandemic to 4 in 10 in early 2021 (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). Although this rate tapered to about 3 in 10 by mid-2022, it remained well above pre-2019 levels (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). Other high-income countries reported similar patterns. For example, over one-quarter of people in 15 OECD countries were at risk of depression or anxiety in 2020, a level far higher than before the crisis (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF) ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). The elevated demand for mental health care has persisted into the post-pandemic period, indicating that the surge was not a short-lived anomaly but rather a shift in baseline needs.
Spike in Mental Health Conditions: 2019 vs. Today
Multiple specific mental health conditions have risen in prevalence or severity since 2019, contributing to higher psychiatric service usage. Key conditions showing significant increases include:
Depression and Anxiety Disorders
Depression rates have climbed dramatically. Surveys in the U.S. found that the prevalence of adult depressive symptoms tripled during the pandemic: from about 8.5% pre-2020 to 27.8% in 2020 (Depression Rates in US Tripled When the Pandemic First Hit—Now, They’re Even Worse | The Brink | Boston University). By 2021, that figure worsened to 32.8% – affecting roughly 1 in 3 adults (Depression Rates in US Tripled When the Pandemic First Hit—Now, They’re Even Worse | The Brink | Boston University). This pattern aligns with global observations; as noted, anxiety and depression together jumped 25% worldwide in 2020 ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). Anxiety disorders likewise spiked alongside depression. In early 2021, approximately 40% of U.S. adults reported clinically significant anxiety or depressive symptoms (vs. ~11% in 2019) (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). European countries saw comparable surges in mental distress indicators ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). The steep rise in depression and anxiety during 2020–2021 has only partially receded – levels remain elevated relative to 2019. Certain groups were especially affected: young adults and women were worst hit, showing the largest increases in anxiety/depression prevalence ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). These data indicate a sustained higher burden of mood and anxiety disorders in developed nations post-2019.
To illustrate the magnitude of change in depression/anxiety rates before and during the pandemic:
- Global prevalence of depression/anxiety: +25% in 2020 compared to 2019 ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ).
- U.S. adults with depression: 8.5% (2019) → 27.8% (2020) → 32.8% (2021) (Depression Rates in US Tripled When the Pandemic First Hit—Now, They’re Even Worse | The Brink | Boston University).
- U.S. adults with anxiety/depression symptoms: ~11% (2019) → ~40% (early 2021) (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF) (settling to ~30% in 2022).
Such increases strained outpatient mental health clinics and counseling services, as more individuals sought evaluations or medication for new-onset depression and anxiety. Antidepressant prescriptions and therapy referrals in many countries climbed accordingly (as an example, UK primary care referrals for mental health issues have risen sharply since 2020, with anxiety referrals for children more than doubling pre-COVID levels ( Shocking rise in children needing treatment for anxiety ) ( Shocking rise in children needing treatment for anxiety )). In sum, depression and anxiety disorders have become significantly more common, driving a large portion of the overall rise in psychiatric service utilization.
Eating Disorders
Eating disorders, such as anorexia nervosa and bulimia, have seen alarming growth, particularly among adolescents and young adults during the pandemic period. Research indicates the number of teens with eating disorders at least doubled during the COVID-19 pandemic (Eating disorders in teens more than doubled during pandemic). For example, pediatric hospitals in various developed countries reported 2× or higher admissions for eating disorders compared to pre-2019 baselines (Eating disorders in teens more than doubled during pandemic). This trend was noted worldwide: clinicians observed a wave of severe anorexia cases triggered or exacerbated by pandemic stressors. In Canada, one analysis confirmed that hospital admissions for eating disorders rose significantly above pre-pandemic levels (even as other psychiatric admissions initially dipped) ( Hospital Admissions for Personality Disorders Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic – PMC ) ( Hospital Admissions for Personality Disorders Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic – PMC ). Lockdowns, school closures, and social media exposure are thought to have contributed to body image issues, anxiety around food, and loss of routine – all potential eating disorder triggers. By 2021–2022, many treatment programs in the U.S. and Europe were stretched by the influx of eating disorder patients. This increase is especially concerning given that eating disorders already carried high mortality risk and often require intensive psychiatric and medical intervention (Eating disorders in teens more than doubled during pandemic). The pandemic’s impact has thus reversed some prior progress in early identification and management of these conditions, leaving a legacy of greater demand for specialized psychiatric care (such as inpatient units for anorexia) in developed countries.
Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) and Other Severe Conditions
Borderline personality disorder (BPD), an example of a serious mental illness, has also shown notable increases in clinical attention during this period. Patients with BPD appear to have been particularly vulnerable to pandemic stress. A study of a psychiatric emergency department in Berlin found that BPD patients had a significantly higher risk of presenting after suicide attempts during COVID waves – over three times the risk compared to pre-pandemic periods ( Particular vulnerability of patients with borderline personality disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic – a retrospective chart review – PMC ). More broadly, hospital data from Alberta, Canada revealed the only psychiatric diagnostic category (besides eating disorders) with a distinct pandemic-era spike in admissions was personality disorders ( Hospital Admissions for Personality Disorders Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic – PMC ). These personality disorder hospitalizations (77% of which were BPD cases) showed a clear increase about 9–15 months after the pandemic onset, with admission rates peaking well above 2019 levels ( Hospital Admissions for Personality Disorders Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic – PMC ) ( Hospital Admissions for Personality Disorders Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic – PMC ). In fact, the surge in BPD-related admissions was “more pronounced than the widely reported increase in admissions for eating disorders,” according to the researchers ( Hospital Admissions for Personality Disorders Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic – PMC ). This suggests that individuals with pre-existing emotional instability and trauma-related disorders faced worsening symptoms (e.g. self-harm, acute crises) under the isolation and uncertainty of COVID-19. Post-pandemic, outpatient clinics in developed countries have noted higher caseloads of patients with personality disorders requiring therapy or crisis intervention. The data underline that severe and complex psychiatric disorders like BPD not only persisted but in many cases intensified, contributing to the sustained high demand for psychiatric care.
Suicide Rates and Self-Harm
Suicide rates and self-harm behaviors present a complex picture over 2019–present, but overall the trend in many developed nations is worrying. Initially, some areas saw stable or even lower suicide numbers in the early months of the pandemic (hypothesized to result from short-term social cohesion or reduced opportunities for suicide during strict lockdowns). However, as the pandemic wore on, suicidality began to rise. In the United States, after a slight decline in 2019–2020, suicide deaths increased ~5% in 2021 and then a further 2.6% in 2022 (Provisional Suicide Deaths in the United States, 2022 | CDC Online Newsroom | CDC). Provisional CDC data recorded 49,449 suicide deaths in the U.S. in 2022, the highest number ever, with an age-adjusted rate of 14.3 per 100,000 people (Provisional Suicide Deaths in the United States, 2022 | CDC Online Newsroom | CDC). This indicates the mental health crisis translated into deadly outcomes. Other high-income countries saw similar patterns: Japan, for example, reported a significant increase in suicides in late 2020, especially among women, reversing a decade-long decline (Significant increase in suicide rates in women and younger age …).
Youth self-harm has spiked dramatically. The CDC observed that emergency department visits for suspected suicide attempts among U.S. adolescent girls jumped by 51% in early 2021 compared to 2019 ( CDC data finds sharp rise in suicide attempts among teen girls amid COVID‐19 – PMC ). (Among same-age boys the increase was smaller at 4% ( CDC data finds sharp rise in suicide attempts among teen girls amid COVID‐19 – PMC ), highlighting a disproportionate impact on young females.) This surge in teen suicide attempts and ideation corresponds with other data on youth mental health: in 2021, 30% of U.S. adolescent girls seriously considered suicide, up from roughly 19% pre-pandemic (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). Many European countries also reported higher youth self-harm incidents and eating disorder-related self-injury during lockdowns. In summary, suicidal behavior and suicide mortality have trended upward since 2019 in numerous developed nations – a grave indicator of the pandemic’s toll. While exact suicide rates vary by country, the overall crisis of hopelessness, particularly among young people, is evident in healthcare statistics. Suicide prevention services and psychiatric units have faced greater caseloads as a result.
(Table: Selected Mental Health Indicators Before and During the Pandemic)
Key: ↑ denotes increase. (A dash indicates no directly comparable pre-pandemic statistic; changes are described qualitatively in those cases.)
The above data snapshots highlight that virtually every major metric of mental health burden – from common disorders (depression, anxiety) to severe illnesses (eating disorders, BPD) and suicidal behavior – deteriorated in the period from 2019 to the pandemic peak. While some metrics improved slightly after the initial peak, most remain well above pre-pandemic norms as of the present, contributing to sustained high demand for psychiatric care in developed countries.
Impact of Social Distancing and Isolation
Pandemic containment measures (lockdowns, social distancing mandates, school closures) had a profound effect on social behavior and media consumption – with direct consequences for mental health. Extended social distancing led to widespread isolation. Normal face-to-face interactions with friends, extended family, coworkers, and support groups were severed or moved online. This isolation was one of the major drivers of the mental health surge ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). WHO notes that the “unprecedented stress” of social isolation, along with constraints on work and community engagement, fueled anxiety and depression globally ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). Loneliness became pervasive: even as restrictions eased, many people remained in a habit of limited social contact. By 2023, about one-third of American adults reported feeling chronically lonely – a 70% increase compared to pre-COVID levels (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19). Loneliness is a well-known risk factor for mental illnesses (and even early mortality) (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19), so its spike during and after the pandemic has had serious public health implications.
With in-person social life curtailed, media consumption soared to fill the void. Households dramatically increased their screen time – whether via television, streaming services, or social media – both for news and for virtual social connection. For example, one international study found social media usage jumped by 61% during COVID lockdowns ( #COVID-19: Forms and drivers of social media users’ engagement behavior toward a global crisis – PMC ). Platforms like Instagram reported a 70% surge in live video viewership at the start of stay-at-home orders (Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social media – Wikipedia). People turned to phones and computers as their lifeline to the outside world. This had a double-edged effect: on one hand, technology allowed remote work, online schooling, and staying in touch with loved ones, mitigating some mental health harms of isolation. On the other hand, excessive media exposure and “doomscrolling” (consuming endless news about COVID-19, economic troubles, etc.) heightened stress for many. Studies during the pandemic showed that individuals who spent more time on social media were often more anxious – partly due to constant exposure to others’ distress and misinformation ( #COVID-19: Forms and drivers of social media users’ engagement behavior toward a global crisis – PMC ) ( #COVID-19: Forms and drivers of social media users’ engagement behavior toward a global crisis – PMC ). Increases in sedentary behavior and disrupted routines (from binge-watching TV or gaming) also negatively impacted mood and sleep for some.
Overall, social distancing measures, while epidemiologically necessary, contributed to a climate of isolation and heavy media consumption that exacerbated mental health issues. People’s coping mechanisms were stretched thin. The combination of loneliness, fear of infection and death ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ), and often an echo chamber of negative news, created fertile ground for anxiety, depression, and anger. It is notable that mental health helpline calls regarding fear and loneliness spiked in lockstep with stay-at-home orders, as noted earlier (Amid COVID, a 35% surge in calls to mental health helplines | CIDRAP). The legacy of this period is seen in ongoing struggles with social anxiety (many became apprehensive about re-entering society) and internet overuse. Even post-lockdown, “re-entry” anxiety and persistent disconnection have been observed – some people continue to socialize less than before, whether by choice or lingering habit (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19). This suggests that the mental health impact of social distancing did not fully reverse when restrictions lifted; for many, the psychological imprint (increased loneliness and reliance on digital life) has lingered and continues to drive higher psychiatric service needs.
Post-Pandemic Mental Health: The Normalization Myth
There was hope in mid-2021 and 2022 that as COVID-19 cases waned and life returned to “normal,” the population’s mental health would rebound to pre-pandemic levels. Unfortunately, that normalization largely did not materialize – a myth, as ongoing data shows a sustained mental health crisis. While the acute shock of 2020 has passed, its effects persist. By late 2022 and 2023, mental health indicators remained worse than before 2019 on virtually every front. In the U.S., three years after the pandemic began, 90% of adults believed the country was facing a mental health crisis (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). Surveys and health records confirm that depression, anxiety, and trauma-related conditions remained highly prevalent, especially among the young. For instance, the CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Survey in 2021 found record-high levels of persistent sadness among teens (over half of high school girls) and other lingering effects of the pandemic on youth well-being (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF) (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF).
Crucially, the expected reversion to baseline never fully occurred for many metrics. After the initial spike in 2020, rates of anxiety/depression symptoms in adults declined somewhat but plateaued at a new, elevated baseline (around 30% of adults vs ~10% pre-COVID) (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). Similarly, while some emergency mental health visits dropped when lockdowns ended, overall utilization rebounded above pre-pandemic levels rather than back to them (Amid COVID, a 35% surge in calls to mental health helplines | CIDRAP). The “new normal” in the post-pandemic era is one where demand for mental health services is significantly higher than before, and many people continue to struggle. A 2023 commentary noted: “the mental health toll from over two years of lockdowns, isolation, fear, and upheaval is still being felt profoundly” – our world has changed in ways that continue to impact psychological well-being (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19).
Some specific post-pandemic developments underscore the persistent crisis:
- Continued loneliness and social difficulties: As mentioned, about one-third of adults report high loneliness in 2023 (well above 2019 levels) (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19). Many individuals have found it hard to reintegrate socially, with residual anxiety about gatherings and a preference for the safety of home. Remote work becoming more common has also reduced daily social interaction for millions (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19). This prolonged social fragmentation keeps baseline stress and depression levels higher than before.
- Youth and “Generation COVID”: Mental health experts warn of a generation-wide impact. Children and adolescents who lived through school closures and disruptions have not simply bounced back; rates of anxiety, behavioral problems, and academic difficulties remain elevated. The so-called “crisis pandemic cohort” is now facing ongoing challenges, with record numbers seeking counseling for issues like panic attacks, attention deficits, and social withdrawal. The surge in youth mental health problems has not normalized – e.g., referrals for child anxiety in England doubled vs. pre-COVID and are still high ( Shocking rise in children needing treatment for anxiety ) ( Shocking rise in children needing treatment for anxiety ). This indicates a lasting effect that may persist for years.
- Chronic stress and burnout: The pandemic exposed many to sustained stress (health fears, financial strain, grief from loss of loved ones). Psychologically, chronic stress can lead to long-term anxiety, sleep problems, or burnout. By 2022, surveys of adults found high rates of burnout and fatigue, even with COVID largely under control. Frontline healthcare workers in particular continue to report elevated levels of PTSD and burnout, given their intense pandemic experiences ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). Such chronic mental health conditions add to continued psychiatric caseloads.
In summary, the notion that mental health would “snap back” to normal after COVID restrictions ended has proven false. Instead, the crisis persisted into the so-called recovery period, revealing deep-rooted and lingering effects. As of the present, developed countries are contending with what many call a secondary pandemic of mental illness. Governments and health systems have recognized this by keeping expanded services in place. For example, many countries have increased funding for mental health in 2022–2023 budgets, acknowledging that higher demand is likely permanent. Far from normalizing, the post-pandemic mental health landscape remains in a state of heightened alert, with policymakers calling for continued resources to tackle the enduring crisis (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF) (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19).
Economic Fallout and Mental Health
The COVID-19 pandemic sparked not only a health crisis but also a severe economic crisis. The resulting job losses, financial insecurity, and economic anxiety have been major contributors to the rise in psychiatric applications. Developed economies saw historic spikes in unemployment virtually overnight in 2020. For example, in April 2020 the U.S. unemployment rate hit 14.8% (the highest since World War II), up from just 3.5% in February 2020. On average across the OECD, unemployment more than doubled in the second quarter of 2020 (Unemployment rises in 2020, as the country battles the COVID-19 …). The International Labour Organization estimated that worldwide in 2020, working hours lost were equivalent to 255 million full-time jobs – $3.7 trillion in labor income lost globally (COVID-19 has caused a huge amount of lost working hours). Although job markets rebounded somewhat in 2021–2022, many people remained underemployed or left the labor force. Certain sectors (hospitality, travel, retail) and demographic groups (youth, women) were hit disproportionately hard (global unemployment rate – — SDG Indicators – the United Nations).
This economic upheaval had direct mental health repercussions. Financial stress is a well-known driver of psychological distress, and during the pandemic it became widespread. Surveys during 2020–21 showed sharp increases in the number of people worried about paying bills, rent, or debts. In late 2022, over 60% of Americans reported that money was a major source of anxiety (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19). Lost jobs and income, combined with an uncertain future, led to surges in depression, anxiety, and substance use in those affected. Indeed, adults who experienced pandemic-related job loss or financial instability consistently reported worse mental health outcomes than those who did not (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). One analysis found anxiety and depression symptoms were far more pronounced (up to 2× higher) among individuals experiencing household job loss during the pandemic (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF).
Economic recessions are historically linked to higher suicide rates and mental illness, and the COVID recession followed that pattern. Studies of previous downturns (e.g. 2008 financial crisis) saw increases in suicides and hospitalizations for mental health issues correlating with rising unemployment (Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on Health in High-Income Oecd …). During COVID, some of the highest spikes in mental health hotline calls related to financial distress occurred in tandem with waves of layoffs (Amid COVID, a 35% surge in calls to mental health helplines | CIDRAP) (Amid COVID, a 35% surge in calls to mental health helplines | CIDRAP). While government stimulus and furlough programs in developed countries provided some buffer, many individuals still faced lasting economic hardship. By 2021, household debt levels and poverty rates had grown in various countries, adding to chronic stress for families. For those who lost jobs, the psychological impact often persisted even after the immediate crisis – long-term unemployment can lead to demoralization and worsened mental health.
Conversely, as economies recovered, there was some positive effect on mental health metrics. For instance, antidepressant use and anxiety rates showed slight improvement in regions where employment substantially bounced back in 2021. However, by and large, the financial fallout of the pandemic has left a mental health scar. Even in 2023, many people are still grappling with pandemic-related economic losses: careers derailed, savings depleted, or houses lost. This ongoing financial insecurity continues to drive people to seek mental health support. Therapists and primary care doctors have reported an uptick in patients citing money or job worries as stressors contributing to insomnia, depression, and substance abuse.
It’s important to note that financial stress is one of the strongest predictors of mental illness (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19). Economic and mental health crises can form a vicious cycle: poor economy fuels mental health issues, and those issues (if untreated) can hinder economic productivity. As one 2022 poll illustrated, the majority of people under financial strain experience tangible anxiety or depression symptoms (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19). This overlap was painfully visible in the pandemic. Policymakers have thus identified economic recovery and mental health recovery as intertwined goals. In sum, the COVID-induced job loss and financial strain in developed countries significantly boosted the need for psychiatric services, as millions battled stress, depression, and trauma tied to economic upheaval.
Emerging Challenge: AI-Driven Job Loss and Mental Health
Just as societies began to recover from pandemic job losses, a new wave of concern has arrived in the form of automation and AI-driven job displacement. Over the past couple of years, rapid advancements in artificial intelligence (e.g. AI chatbots, machine learning systems) have led companies to explore automation of tasks that were once done by humans. This has introduced fresh stressors in the labor market that are impacting mental health in developed countries.
Workers are increasingly anxious that AI could render their skills obsolete. A recent (2023) American Psychological Association survey found that close to 2 in 5 workers (38%) worry that AI might make some or all of their job duties obsolete (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa). Notably, these worries are already manifesting in poorer mental health: among workers concerned about AI, a majority say these concerns negatively affect their mental well-being, and one-third of those worried rate their mental health as “fair or poor,” significantly worse than average (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa). In other words, the fear of potential job loss to AI is tangibly increasing stress, anxiety, and pessimism among a substantial segment of the workforce. This phenomenon has been termed “automation anxiety.”
High-profile events have amplified these concerns. For example, in 2023 some large tech companies announced layoffs explicitly citing efficiency gains and future automation. Though AI-related layoffs still accounted for only ~0.5% of all job cuts in 2023 (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa), the messaging has alarmed employees far beyond the tech sector. Media coverage predicting that 20–30% of jobs could be impacted by AI within a decade (from analyses by Goldman Sachs, McKinsey, etc. (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa)) has further fueled uncertainty. For many, this translates into chronic job insecurity – a known source of psychological strain comparable to unemployment itself. Research has shown that the stress of job insecurity can produce health effects on par with actually being unemployed (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa). When someone feels their livelihood is under threat, it can lead to constant anxiety, burnout, and diminished life satisfaction.
From a psychiatric perspective, clinicians are starting to hear more patients express anxiety about technological unemployment. This includes fears of income loss, identity issues after losing one’s career role, and a general sense of instability about the future. Young professionals and mid-career workers in fields like customer service, data analysis, manufacturing, and even creative industries are reporting heightened stress about staying employable. Such anxiety can exacerbate or trigger disorders – for instance, an individual with underlying anxiety disorder may experience worsened symptoms due to AI-related worry.
It’s important to highlight that not all workers feel this way – many are also optimistic about AI. But the segment that is worried is large enough to register in national mental health surveys. 38% of U.S. workers stressed about AI is millions of people (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa). In the UK and EU, similar surveys have found a significant minority losing confidence in job stability due to automation, correlating with poorer mental health self-reports. This emerging trend suggests that AI-driven job loss (or the fear of it) is an additional contributor to mental health struggles in developed economies, on top of the pandemic aftershocks.
Looking ahead, if AI adoption accelerates, we may see further waves of “applications” to psychiatric services from those dealing with displacement or needing to reskill. It raises the need for proactive measures: career counseling, job transition programs, and mental health support specifically targeted at workforce changes. The mental health field may need to integrate understanding of AI-related stress into therapy (similar to how financial counseling became a part of therapy after 2008’s recession). In summary, the AI revolution – while full of promise – has a dark side in mental health terms, as job insecurity and displacement fears add another layer to the already elevated stress levels of the post-2019 era.
Key Takeaways
- Mental Health Surge During COVID-19: Developed countries experienced a sharp rise in psychiatric cases starting in 2020. Global depression and anxiety prevalence jumped ~25% in 2020 ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ), and many countries saw record levels of mental distress. This led to surging demand for mental health services (e.g. helpline calls up 35% (Amid COVID, a 35% surge in calls to mental health helplines | CIDRAP), more hospital admissions, etc.).
- Specific Conditions Worsened: Several disorders saw notable increases:
- Depression & Anxiety: Symptoms hit 3–4 times pre-pandemic levels at their peak (Depression Rates in US Tripled When the Pandemic First Hit—Now, They’re Even Worse | The Brink | Boston University) (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). These common disorders remain more widespread in 2023 than in 2019.
- Eating Disorders: Cases doubled among teens during lockdowns (Eating disorders in teens more than doubled during pandemic), leading to a wave of hospitalizations globally ( Hospital Admissions for Personality Disorders Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic – PMC ).
- Borderline Personality Disorder: Stress and isolation disproportionately affected BPD patients – studies noted elevated suicide attempts and a post-pandemic spike in BPD hospitalizations ( Particular vulnerability of patients with borderline personality disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic – a retrospective chart review – PMC ) ( Hospital Admissions for Personality Disorders Increased During the COVID-19 Pandemic – PMC ).
- Suicide: After an initial pause, suicide rates climbed in many developed nations. The U.S. hit its highest-ever number of suicides in 2022 (~49,000 deaths) (Provisional Suicide Deaths in the United States, 2022 | CDC Online Newsroom | CDC). Youth suicide attempts, especially among adolescent girls, rose alarmingly (50%+ increases) ( CDC data finds sharp rise in suicide attempts among teen girls amid COVID‐19 – PMC ).
- Social Distancing Effects: Prolonged lockdowns and social distancing led to greater isolation and loneliness, which in turn fueled mental health issues. People filled the social void with increased screen time – global social media use rose ~60% under lockdowns ( #COVID-19: Forms and drivers of social media users’ engagement behavior toward a global crisis – PMC ). However, heavy media consumption and “doomscrolling” often exacerbated anxiety and stress, creating a negative feedback loop. The lack of in-person support was a key factor in the mental health decline ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ).
- No Quick Rebound to Normal: The anticipated post-pandemic improvement in mental health largely did not occur. Instead, the crisis has persisted. By 2023, mental health metrics remain far worse than pre-2019 (e.g. high prevalence of symptoms, sustained youth crises). ~90% of Americans consider the current situation a mental health crisis (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF). This “new normal” of elevated mental health need means health systems are still under strain, and the pandemic’s psychological fallout continues unabated.
- Economic Stress and Mental Health: COVID-19’s economic toll (job losses, financial insecurity) significantly worsened mental well-being. Tens of millions lost jobs worldwide; 255 million job equivalents were lost in 2020 (COVID-19 has caused a huge amount of lost working hours), causing widespread anxiety. Financial stress (which over 60% of people cited as a major anxiety source in 2022 (Dana Behavioral Health – The Lasting Mental Health Impact of Covid-19)) contributed to higher rates of depression, substance use, and suicide. Areas with severe unemployment spikes saw correlating surges in mental health service utilization. Economic recovery and mental health recovery are closely linked.
- AI and Job Insecurity – a New Factor: In recent years, concerns about AI-driven job loss have emerged as an additional mental health stressor. 38% of workers in one survey feared AI might render their jobs obsolete (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa), and most of those reported negative impacts on their mental health (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa). This trend suggests that even as the pandemic’s effects linger, new challenges like automation anxiety are contributing to depression and anxiety in the workforce. Job insecurity related to AI can mirror the mental harm of unemployment (How worried are workers about AI? – Wysa), indicating a need for preemptive support in this area.
Visual Summary: The following figures (if available) would illustrate these trends – for example, a graph of U.S. adults with anxiety/depression symptoms showing a spike in 2020–2021 (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF), or a chart of youth suicide attempt rates before and during COVID ( CDC data finds sharp rise in suicide attempts among teen girls amid COVID‐19 – PMC ). Such visuals reinforce the statistical story: a sharp uptick around 2020, with levels remaining elevated through 2022. They also highlight the multifaceted nature of the crisis (multiple conditions all worsening concurrently).
In conclusion, from 2019 to the present, developed countries have witnessed an enduring increase in psychiatric cases and service utilization. The COVID-19 pandemic was the catalyst for a mental health crisis – driven by isolation, fear, bereavement, and economic upheaval – that shows only modest signs of abating. Depression, anxiety, eating disorders, and youth suicidality have all reached concerning levels. As societies adapt to a post-pandemic world, the data dispel any notion of quick normalization. Instead, they call for sustained investment in mental health services, workplace mental health programs, and community support to address the “long tail” of this psychiatric surge. Additionally, as new issues like AI-related anxiety arise, a proactive approach is needed to prevent further deterioration of mental well-being. The key takeaway is that mental health needs in developed nations are higher today than they were in 2019, and understanding the drivers – social isolation, economic stress, and emerging tech-driven insecurities – is crucial to formulating an effective response (The Implications of COVID-19 for Mental Health and Substance Use | KFF) ( COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide ). The challenge moving forward will be to translate this awareness into action, ensuring accessible care for those affected and building resilience against future crises.
Žižekian Analysis 
[…] (Turkish, English) […]
LikeLike
[…] (İngilizcesi, Almancası) […]
LikeLike
[…] — Increase in Psychiatric Applications (2019–Present): A Comprehensive Analysis […]
LikeLike
[…] — Increase in Psychiatric Applications (2019–Present): A Comprehensive Analysis […]
LikeLike