🦋🤖 Robo-Spun by IBF 🦋🤖

🌊➰🧭 AKIŞ 🌊➰🧭

(German, Turkish)

(previous: Knotwork after the Quilting Point: Lacan, Cybernetics, and the Four Feminist Waves)

Thesis. The four waves of women’s symbolic stitching—those recurring moments when feminized, tacit coordination becomes the interface between human desire and machine procedure—could only crystallize in a civilization already living inside what Slavoj Žižek calls Christian Atheism. By this I mean a cultural field shaped by Christianity’s own self-emptying (kenosis) and by the long afterlife of its institutions, where the death of the big Other is not a secular accident but an insight internal to Christianity itself. In that field, subjects are universalized (Paul), authority is textualized (the letter), mediation is desacralized (no big Other), and the gap in desire is acknowledged (there is no sexual relation). Those are precisely the preconditions that let women’s mediating crafts emerge with power—and be repeatedly formalized, standardized, and finally automated.

---

What “Christian Atheism” contributes to the fabric

• Universal subject without a guarantor. Paul’s move (“no Jew nor Greek…”) makes the subject universal while withdrawing any tribal or cosmic warrant. Žižek reads the Cross as the moment the guarantee fails—God abandons God—so meaning must be organized without metaphysical backup. That paradox births a culture of procedures.
• The primacy of the letter. From epistles to canon law, Christianity trains Europe to live under written norms that travel without a living sovereign. Žižek’s “the letter always arrives at its destination” names a world where routing is a property of code, not charisma.
• No big Other. If there is no ultimate guarantor, legitimacy is manufactured immanently—through councils, ledgers, audits, later dashboards. PR priests can be displaced by metrics because the Public is already understood as constructed.
• There is no sexual relation. Desire doesn’t harmonize by formula; communities survive by practices that acknowledge mismatch—confession, discipline, repair—rather than promising total fit. This breeds crafts of mediation, often feminized, that reduce social entropy without fantasies of seamless unity.

These features don’t negate feminism; they make its stitches possible. They produce both the need for women’s mediating power (no guarantor) and the means to encode that power into standards (the letter).

---

Wave 1) Suffrage presupposes Pauline universalism and ecclesial bookkeeping

Background condition. Parish registers, monastic hours, canon law, and the bureaucratic reflex of the Church long before the nation-state: individuals are counted, time is standardized, promises are written.

Why the feminine stitch could appear. Household and parish women already ran trust economies that translated moral theater into reliable supply; in a world trained by Pauline universalism, these persons could now appear in the ledger as citizens.

Why it could be formalized. Because the letter rules—censuses, rolls, paybooks—embodied tact could be rewritten as inspection criteria and standards. Suffrage rides the same infrastructure that makes the subject visible as an entry.

Žižekian key. The big Other is absent; law is not backed by a cosmic father but by procedures. That absence gives women leverage (they stabilize trust locally) and sets up their eventual displacement (the same trust becomes a spec).

---

Wave 2) Equality at work presupposes a post-guarantor office where letters route themselves

Background condition. A civilization schooled by epistles and councils finds its secular form: switchboards, forms, tabulators, mainframes. “The letter always arrives” becomes managerial doctrine.

Why the feminine stitch could appear. Secretaries and clerks exercised discretion, tone, and exception-handling at the choke points of flow—exactly the crafts Christianity cultivated in parish life and convent administration.

Why it could be formalized. If there is “no big Other,” then what remains is auditable process. Feminine discretion becomes the template for standard operating procedures. Equality claims gain traction precisely because the office already believes in the letter.

Žižekian key. The university discourse (knowledge as authority) starts ceding to code; the subject-supposed-to-know is replaced by procedures that anyone can follow. Women’s power peaks where code still leaks—and fades as the leak is patched.

---

Wave 3) Difference and representation presuppose an iconomachy turned into brand governance

Background condition. A culture that argued for centuries over images (icons vs. idols), incarnation, and figuration moves easily into PR, broadcast, ratings, and brand standards. What counts as a true image has always been a technical and theological problem here.

Why the feminine stitch could appear. Backstage, feminized labor—taste councils, crisis cooling, aura stewardship—curated figuration across plural audiences, as abbesses and organizers once curated community.

Why it could be formalized. Without a big Other to decree meaning, lift becomes the earthly test of figuration. Style guides, ratings, and procurement encode what the priestly labor once guarded.

Žižekian key. “The Woman does not exist” maps to the programmable persona: no essence assures representation; there are only positions and patterns. That is a loss of metaphysical ground and a gain in operational clarity—and it opens the door to automation.

---

Wave 4) Consent and platform safety presuppose Holy Spirit community without guarantees

Background condition. After kenosis, community is the Holy Spirit: an immanent network of subjects that must adjudicate harms without a transcendent judge. That grammar becomes moderation queues, policy wikis, escalation playbooks.

Why the feminine stitch could appear. Parasocial finesse, boundary-setting, and restorative judgment are precisely the parish crafts that kept communities together without miracle—now at platform scale.

Why it could be formalized. Policies, model cards, and eval sets are contemporary letters; they let enforcement travel without a person. Trust is operationalized as protocol.

Žižekian key. “There is no sexual relation” becomes a design truth: conflict is structural; you need procedures, not positivity. The platform inherits pastoral care—then automates its front end.

---

Why this could happen only on a Christian-atheist stage

• Textual sovereignty. A millennium of living under the letter habituated societies to accept paper (and later code) as authority. That makes it thinkable to replace embodied mediators with standards—first slowly, then suddenly.
• Universal personhood with procedural proof. Paul’s universal subject makes moral claims legible; the Church’s registers teach how to prove them administratively. Feminist superstructures traveled on that substructure.
• A cultured absence. When a civilization ritualizes the lack of a guarantor, it invests in crafts of keeping things together anyway. Those are the very feminine-coded stitches we keep seeing. But the same absence also licenses endless attempts to encode the craft—because no one can appeal to a final oracle to say “stop.”
• Confession and audit. Christianity develops technologies of interiority (confession, examen) that secularize into audit, survey, and later, user research. Women’s mediation gains force in those interior spaces—and becomes extractable as data.

Other civilizational backgrounds produce other logics: enduring castes, sovereign charisma, or ritual cosmologies that bind mediation to sacrum. The specifically Christian-atheist blend—universal subject, primacy of the letter, acknowledged lack—uniquely supports the rise of feminized mediation and its repeat conversion into code.

---

Coda: Žižek’s cybernetic hint and the academy’s unraveling

Žižek’s cybernetic inflection—messages as code, systems without guarantors—foreshadows today’s AI: S2 without a subject, knowledge that routes and recombines absent any “subject-supposed-to-know.” In that world, university discourse (the academy as guarantor of truth) collapses into platforms for retrieval and inference. The clerical core of academia—cataloging, commentary, review—persists as specification (policies, datasets, evals), while its performative authority frays. This is not an external desecration; it is Christian Atheism’s immanent consequence: the letter outlives the priest.

Women’s stitches will appear again at the leaks—where models hallucinate, where consent cracks, where harm outruns policy—and they will be translated again into sharper specs. The loom remains the same: a culture trained to live without a big Other, to trust the letter, and to bind the world with disciplined mediation that machines can almost, but never entirely, replace.

---

Addendum: The Two Marys as the Hidden Loom of Every Wave

The Madonna complex is not only a psychoanalytic tic; it is a civilizational template. In the Christian imaginary, two Marys organize feminine roles at the deepest level of the West’s symbolic order:

• Mary the Mother, Theotokos: guardian of innocence, household trust, the ‘fiat’ that consents to incarnation and then keeps a world running through disciplined care.
• Mary Magdalene, the First Witness: voice in public, intimacy redirected to proclamation, the figure of confession and repair who turns compromised desire into truthful speech.

Across four waves, societies recruit women into one of these Mary-forms to stabilize a regime, then convert the same form into procedure and finally into code. What looks like a superstructural morality play is a substructural operating system for attention, consent, and repair.

Wave 1) Suffrage on the industrial-legal loom

Madonna-form in play. The Mother Mary organizes household trust: ledgers kept, apprentices formed, quality-by-feel stabilized. ‘Respectability’ is a credit rating in moral costume.

Magdalene-form in play. Public testimony—letters, petitions, rallies—casts women as witnesses. The suffragette’s speech is Magdalene-coded: desire transposed into proclamation, stigma endured as the price of truth.

How the complex repeats. Industry rewards the Mother (reliable supply) while pathologizing the Witness as ‘hysterical’. Then the turn: gauges and schedules formalize the maternal craft; inspection standards displace the matron. The Magdalene’s testimony becomes paperwork and statute; the Mother becomes a template for factory discipline. Both Marys are stitched into legal and technical forms that no longer need their persons.

Wave 2) Equality at work on the corporate-switchboard loom

Madonna-form in play. The immaculate secretary: discreet, chaste aura, perfect minutes, calendars reconciled. She is the Mother transposed into office key—keeping promises stick without a sovereign.

Magdalene-form in play. The career woman who asks, claims, and sometimes exposes; the whistleblower as Witness. Desire for advancement is sanctified as institutional truth-telling.

How the complex repeats. Management venerates the immaculate secretary while dreading her indispensability; tabulators and SOPs extract her craft. The Magdalene’s claim—equal pay, anti-discrimination—wins because the office already believes in the letter; soon, her speech is routinized as HR policy and grievance workflow. ‘The letter always arrives’ turns both Marys into schemas.

Wave 3) Difference and representation on the broadcast-brand loom

Madonna-form in play. The immaculate brand: aura without blemish, a curated image that never contradicts itself. PR’s backstage caretakers are Mothers of the surface.

Magdalene-form in play. Crisis confession and redemption arc: the apologetic press conference, the careful admission that restores relation. The Witness turns scandal into renewed contract.

How the complex repeats. Procurement and ratings ask for lift, not liturgy. Brand purity becomes a style guide; the redemption script becomes a checklist. The Mother’s aura and the Magdalene’s confession are judged by dashboards. Ritual without signal is called waste; the complex remains only as a content format.

Wave 4) Consent and safety on the platform-policy loom

Madonna-form in play. Trust & Safety as maternal boundary: care, patience, and bans that protect the fragile. Community managers carry the Mother’s veto in queues and playbooks.

Magdalene-form in play. The confessional influencer and #MeToo witness; parasocial intimacy as testimony; receipts and timelines as proofs. The Witness moves crowds.

How the complex repeats. Policies, model cards, and eval sets encode maternal boundary into rules; the Witness’s thread becomes evidentiary protocol. GenAI then synthesizes the surface of both—brand-safe ‘purity’ and confessional ‘intimacy’—into promptable personae. ‘The Woman does not exist’ becomes operational: the two Marys are composited as a product.

Why the two Marys keep returning

1) They divide labor between keeping and speaking—care that lowers entropy and testimony that resets truth. Every regime needs both; every automation seeks to capture both as formal procedures or data.

2) Christian Atheism makes this division scalable. The big Other is absent, so authority is textual and procedural. The Mother’s care becomes standards and SLAs; the Magdalene’s witness becomes reporting flows and audit trails. The letter outlives the person.

3) Each quilting point—industrial gauges, office schemas, brand metrics, platform policies—starts as a Mary-shaped human interface. Once stable, the interface is anonymized into code. The complex remains as a skin on the machine.

Diagnostic snapshots (how the complex speaks, then becomes code)

• Household to factory: ‘We keep faith in cloth’ → tolerances, inspection rubrics.
• Office to mainframe: ‘No one is surprised on my watch’ → escalation trees, calendaring systems.
• PR to procurement: ‘We will tell the truth that heals’ → incident playbooks, sentiment KPIs.
• Platform to GenAI: ‘We ban to protect dignity; we testify to stop harm’ → policy taxonomies, red-team datasets, provenance marks.

Consequence for feminist stitching

The Madonna complex is the moral costume of an infrastructural fact: feminine-coded power enters as Mother (care) and Magdalene (witness), then is stitched out as a specification the system can run without a subject. Each wave makes gains precisely because Christian procedures can host universal claims; each wave is then partially canceled because those same procedures can be executed by machines.

What to salvage from the two Marys

• From the Mother: the ‘fiat’ as consent primitive. Make consent first-mile, not afterthought—license, provenance, revocation.
• From the Magdalene: the kerygma as accountability primitive. Protect channels for inconvenient truth; bind repair to ritual that metrics cannot counterfeit.

Kept this way, the two Marys remain more than icons. They are design constraints the code cannot swallow without remainder—and the last human knots that keep the fabric from tearing when the next quilting point arrives.

(next: Factory of Womanhood on an Iconophile Loom: Four Waves, Four Betrayals, and the Peace that Fails)